Difference between revisions of "Talk:Priest of the Wild"
From Drinking and Dragons
|
>Mqs |
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| ''DARYL: Done some nerfing. It seems too weak now, particularly spellcasting. Clr3/Dru3/PotW10 would cast as 12/9 if divided evenly. Wiz3/Clr3/MyT10 would cast each at 13/13. Although, PotW does use the same stat for both, while MyT uses different stats. Please clear all of the above and comment on the most recent version.''
| | http://d20wiki.com/index.php?title=Talk:Priest_of_the_Wild |
| | |
| ''I upped the casting and removed one of the bonus domains. It swung back up to too powerful probably.''
| |
| | |
| ''Comment on this version. I'll refrain from altering anything but formatting until then.''
| |
| | |
| '''Randy:''' Nice formatting!
| |
| | |
| I have a major concern about the animal companion. Keeping it at full strength is too powerful. Have either the first 4 levels of the PrC not count towards the companion or have half the class levels count. Either is fine with me. The 1/2 progression makes it more relevant as you level, but the -4 ends with a more powerful companion. Divine Nature should cost both one use of Wild Shape and one turn attempt, and only last a number of rounds equal to PotW level. This will beef up the companion to compensate for the lower level of companion. (The Woodling template is a *very* good template.
| |
| | |
| Domain spontaneity should also use a spell slot in addition to using a Wild Shape.
| |
| | |
| Spellcasting: Choose one more level where spellcasting is not gained. Probably 1st or 5th.
| |
| | |
| I'm using MyT as my basis for reference, as well as ArcHeiro a little. That said, I still think the PrC is a little over powered but willing to try it out with the above changes.
| |
Latest revision as of 17:17, 29 November 2005