Difference between revisions of "Talk:Priest of the Wild"
From Drinking and Dragons
>Mqs |
>Mqs |
| (6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| '''Randy:''' Nice formatting!
| | http://d20wiki.com/index.php?title=Talk:Priest_of_the_Wild |
| | |
| I have a major concern about the animal companion. Keeping it at full strength is too powerful. Have either the first 4 levels of the PrC not count towards the companion or have half the class levels count. Either is fine with me. The 1/2 progression makes it more relevant as you level, but the -4 ends with a more powerful companion. Divine Nature should cost both one use of Wild Shape and one turn attempt, and only last a number of rounds equal to PotW level. This will beef up the companion to compensate for the lower level of companion. (The Woodling template is a *very* good template.
| |
| ''The animal companion is not too powerful by any means. See below.''
| |
| | |
| Domain spontaneity should also use a spell slot in addition to using a Wild Shape.
| |
| ''It does. It's spontaneous casting like CLW or Summon. Similar to the feat of the same name from CD. I'll reword. I didn't just grant the feat because it would apply for more than one domain.''
| |
| | |
| Spellcasting: Choose one more level where spellcasting is not gained. Probably 1st or 5th.
| |
| | |
| I'm using MyT as my basis for reference, as well as ArcHeiro a little. That said, I still think the PrC is a little over powered but willing to try it out with the above changes.
| |
| ''Arcane Hierophant is itself a "powerful" PrC. I've used it as my basis. Note arcane hierphant levels ALL stack for companion (as well as merged with familiar abilities), gets full stacking for wild shape, has +1/+1 spellcasting for every level and gets to ignore arcane failure. I'll say that divine nature with domain spontaneity is about on par with channel animal/channel plant.''
| |
| | |
| ''This leaves the bonus domain and the extra spell abilities. I'd say both together are worth giving up two (one +1/+1) spellcasting levels.''
| |
| | |
| ''Skills, the list is shorter with the same 4/level. Saves and hit dice are better. I could consider dropping one or the other if you still feel it's necessary.''
| |
| | |
| ''Prerequisites are higher than both MyT and ArHr, neither of which require a feat, specific domain, or turning abilities.
| |
Latest revision as of 17:17, 29 November 2005
