Drinking & Dragons

Wild talk:PC/Bill: Difference between revisions

From Drinking and Dragons
New page: Excellent concepts. If you want my opinion, I favor the Dragonfire adept. --~~~~
 
>Arz
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Excellent concepts. If you want my opinion, I favor the Dragonfire adept. --<strong>[[User:Wizardoest|Randy]]</strong> ([[User talk:Wizardoest|Talk]]) 14:18, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Excellent concepts. If you want my opinion, I favor the Dragonfire adept. --<strong>[[User:Wizardoest|Randy]]</strong> ([[User talk:Wizardoest|Talk]]) 14:18, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
:All good to me. If you aren't bound to race though I'd look at phrenic or one of xph races for these concepts. Kals really shine when they get to spend pp, so finda way to use em. Sarlona book had more psi material. Oh, STILLERZ! Harrison shoulda been MVP! D!--[[User:Arz|Arz]] 16:19, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:19, 2 February 2009

Excellent concepts. If you want my opinion, I favor the Dragonfire adept. --Randy (Talk) 14:18, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

All good to me. If you aren't bound to race though I'd look at phrenic or one of xph races for these concepts. Kals really shine when they get to spend pp, so finda way to use em. Sarlona book had more psi material. Oh, STILLERZ! Harrison shoulda been MVP! D!--Arz 16:19, 2 February 2009 (UTC)