Difference between revisions of "Disposable talk:The Hunting of the Crimson Lord"
From Drinking and Dragons
>Mqs m (signing it) |
Wizardoest (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
If you don't want magic, why allow those? They're magic with another name. Ditto artificer, warlock... --[[User:Robhim|Robhim]] 03:06, 21 May 2008 (UTC) | If you don't want magic, why allow those? They're magic with another name. Ditto artificer, warlock... --[[User:Robhim|Robhim]] 03:06, 21 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
::I drew the line at spells and not spell-like abilities. While characters will have a few spell-like abilities, there will not be a full strength caster in the group. I'm not certain about the ToM and ToB classes, so I thought that I would post them as a possibility and let someone try to talk me into them. --[[User:Wizardoest|Wizardoest]] 14:18, 21 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:18, 21 May 2008
"Shadowcaster (Tome of Magic), Truenamer (Tome of Magic), Classes from Tome of Battle are being considered."
If you don't want magic, why allow those? They're magic with another name. Ditto artificer, warlock... --Robhim 03:06, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
- I drew the line at spells and not spell-like abilities. While characters will have a few spell-like abilities, there will not be a full strength caster in the group. I'm not certain about the ToM and ToB classes, so I thought that I would post them as a possibility and let someone try to talk me into them. --Wizardoest 14:18, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
