Disposable talk:The Hunting of the Crimson Lord/PCs/Daryl: Difference between revisions
From Drinking and Dragons
>Mqs mNo edit summary |
>Askewnotion No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:::Ah ok. Sorry about the fix, didn't know that you figured you'ld be constantly in a rage "stat wise" either. Also, if you are going Dwarf's Toughness, might as well throw in Giant's and Dragon's Toughness while you are at it. --[[User:Askewnotion|Askewnotion]] 18:28, 16 November 2008 (UTC) | :::Ah ok. Sorry about the fix, didn't know that you figured you'ld be constantly in a rage "stat wise" either. Also, if you are going Dwarf's Toughness, might as well throw in Giant's and Dragon's Toughness while you are at it. --[[User:Askewnotion|Askewnotion]] 18:28, 16 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
::Dragon's Toughness requires Base Fort Save +11. AKA, level 18. | ::Dragon's Toughness requires Base Fort Save +11. AKA, level 18. | ||
:::Could always multiclass a bunch. Also, in case it interest you, I can grant full concealment many times per day if you feel like splashing some rouge into your builds. | |||
Revision as of 21:47, 17 November 2008
Since level 15 fighter yeilds nothing, sub your first level with barbarian. 2 more hp + rage. Also, i can give you an extra 75 temp HP each day.
- Good point. I'm *not* actually going to do this build, but I was looking at it this morning just with curiosity. --Robhim 02:26, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
- Ah ok. Sorry about the fix, didn't know that you figured you'ld be constantly in a rage "stat wise" either. Also, if you are going Dwarf's Toughness, might as well throw in Giant's and Dragon's Toughness while you are at it. --Askewnotion 18:28, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
- Dragon's Toughness requires Base Fort Save +11. AKA, level 18.
- Could always multiclass a bunch. Also, in case it interest you, I can grant full concealment many times per day if you feel like splashing some rouge into your builds.
- Good point. I'm *not* actually going to do this build, but I was looking at it this morning just with curiosity. --Robhim 02:26, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
