Wild talk:Rules: Difference between revisions
From Drinking and Dragons
>Askewnotion No edit summary |
>Mqs No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:::Let me know when you've decided. --<strong>[[User:Wizardoest|Randy]]</strong> ([[User talk:Wizardoest|Talk]]) 19:09, 20 February 2009 (UTC) | :::Let me know when you've decided. --<strong>[[User:Wizardoest|Randy]]</strong> ([[User talk:Wizardoest|Talk]]) 19:09, 20 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
::I'd say it's fair to have it be reduced to one round, especially since an artificer drops from 10 rounds to 1 rounds, and that is casting time, not wait time. Though, maybe to make it interesting, you spend the action point instead of rolling the 1d4 as opposed to deciding to do it after a bad roll. --[[User:Askewnotion|Askewnotion]] 19:18, 20 February 2009 (UTC) | ::I'd say it's fair to have it be reduced to one round, especially since an artificer drops from 10 rounds to 1 rounds, and that is casting time, not wait time. Though, maybe to make it interesting, you spend the action point instead of rolling the 1d4 as opposed to deciding to do it after a bad roll. --[[User:Askewnotion|Askewnotion]] 19:18, 20 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
This proposal came up in discussion as solved however a decision has not yet been made. Would an action point reduce the delay by one round? Would spending an action point instead of rolling 1d4 make the delay only a single round? The second seems to continue in the spirit of action points (spending before knowing the result) but eliminates the randomness in the delay. --<strong>[[User:Wizardoest|Randy]]</strong> ([[User talk:Wizardoest|Talk]]) 21:05, 21 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
:Yes. AP = next round. Let's see how it works.--[[User:Mqs|Mqs]] 23:42, 21 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 23:42, 21 August 2009
AP proposal
Another potential use for action points came up during the game tonight—using an action point to reduce the delay for summoning spells by one round. --Randy (Talk) 04:06, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
- Considering actions. This is similar to Artificer's "Hasten Infusion." --Mqs 18:31, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
- I'd say it's fair to have it be reduced to one round, especially since an artificer drops from 10 rounds to 1 rounds, and that is casting time, not wait time. Though, maybe to make it interesting, you spend the action point instead of rolling the 1d4 as opposed to deciding to do it after a bad roll. --Askewnotion 19:18, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
This proposal came up in discussion as solved however a decision has not yet been made. Would an action point reduce the delay by one round? Would spending an action point instead of rolling 1d4 make the delay only a single round? The second seems to continue in the spirit of action points (spending before knowing the result) but eliminates the randomness in the delay. --Randy (Talk) 21:05, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- Yes. AP = next round. Let's see how it works.--Mqs 23:42, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
