Drinking & Dragons

Difference between revisions of "Wild talk:Custom/Erf"

From Drinking and Dragons
>Mqs
(Created page with 'Help me to work these out. Comparing lesser erf to half-elf, it needs a little something, but not much. Greater Erf, as written, was a strong +1, but it's weak as a +2. Ideas?...')
 
>T3knomanser
m
Line 1: Line 1:
Help me to work these out.  Comparing lesser erf to half-elf, it needs a little something, but not much.  Greater Erf, as written, was a strong +1, but it's weak as a +2.  Ideas?  --[[User:Mqs|Mqs]] 15:24, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Help me to work these out.  Comparing lesser erf to half-elf, it needs a little something, but not much.  Greater Erf, as written, was a strong +1, but it's weak as a +2.  Ideas?  --[[User:Mqs|Mqs]] 15:24, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
::Erfs should be very stable. No, wait, did that already. While it doesn't completely fix the balance, I think they should get a +2 appraise as well. --[[User:T3knomanser|t3knomanser]] 01:39, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:39, 5 June 2009

Help me to work these out. Comparing lesser erf to half-elf, it needs a little something, but not much. Greater Erf, as written, was a strong +1, but it's weak as a +2. Ideas? --Mqs 15:24, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Erfs should be very stable. No, wait, did that already. While it doesn't completely fix the balance, I think they should get a +2 appraise as well. --t3knomanser 01:39, 6 June 2009 (UTC)