Drinking & Dragons

Difference between revisions of "User talk:Askewnotion/Warden of the Fire Dragon"

From Drinking and Dragons
>Mqs
m
Line 5: Line 5:
::::I assume that the breath weapon is usable at will each round, per Dragonfire Adept. I agree the Channeling should be dropped. --<strong>[[User:Wizardoest|Randy]]</strong> ([[User talk:Wizardoest|Talk]]) 16:40, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
::::I assume that the breath weapon is usable at will each round, per Dragonfire Adept. I agree the Channeling should be dropped. --<strong>[[User:Wizardoest|Randy]]</strong> ([[User talk:Wizardoest|Talk]]) 16:40, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
:::::Each breath used a turn attempt. --[[User:Mqs|Mqs]] 17:08, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
:::::Each breath used a turn attempt. --[[User:Mqs|Mqs]] 17:08, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
::::::Then perhaps 2 + Con mod times per day? Just Con mod per day would be low, considering how MAD this class is. --<strong>[[User:Wizardoest|Randy]]</strong> ([[User talk:Wizardoest|Talk]]) 18:27, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:27, 15 December 2009

Right now it looks like it tips a little high, but not as high as Duskblade. Open to feedback. --Askewnotion 20:58, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Drop channeling and it'd fit. (Fuel the breath some other way.) --Mqs 03:10, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Con mod times per day is also an option. Everything and it's mother has channeling in Arcanis it appears (and for the most part is useless in turning undead) so it looks like a good fit reguardless. They also ammended it so that the extra turning feat only works for turning undead. Prevents turning feat/power cheese ^_^ --Askewnotion 03:52, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
One of the reasons I suggested axing Channel is because you sort of have a best-of-both-worlds spell list. --Mqs 15:39, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
I assume that the breath weapon is usable at will each round, per Dragonfire Adept. I agree the Channeling should be dropped. --Randy (Talk) 16:40, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Each breath used a turn attempt. --Mqs 17:08, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Then perhaps 2 + Con mod times per day? Just Con mod per day would be low, considering how MAD this class is. --Randy (Talk) 18:27, 15 December 2009 (UTC)