User:Mqs/Greater Eschew Materials: Difference between revisions
From Drinking and Dragons
< User:Mqs
>Mqs mNo edit summary |
Wizardoest (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Feedback, please? Has anyone seen this printed elsewhere? | Feedback, please? Has anyone seen this printed elsewhere? | ||
== Feedback == | |||
I don't believe that XP should be Eschewed. How would eschewing GP interact with expensive foci? Would expensive material components be partially reduced, e.g. paying on 400gp for ''Stoneskin''? --<strong>[[User:Wizardoest|Randy]]</strong> ([[User talk:Wizardoest|Talk]]) 18:24, 23 July 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:24, 23 July 2009
Feat. Requires Eschew Materials, Knowledge (Arcana) 8 ranks.
Benefit: Do not need costly material components up to XX value in GP or YY in XP.
Recommended values: 100 GP, 50 XP.
Even Greater Eschew: 1000, 500... etc?
Variation: Require costly material available, but allow a spellcraft check DC QQ to make it act as a focus instead of being consumed.
Feedback, please? Has anyone seen this printed elsewhere?
Feedback
I don't believe that XP should be Eschewed. How would eschewing GP interact with expensive foci? Would expensive material components be partially reduced, e.g. paying on 400gp for Stoneskin? --Randy (Talk) 18:24, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
