Difference between revisions of "Disposable talk:Arctic Exploration"
From Drinking and Dragons
Wizardoest (talk | contribs) |
>Askewnotion |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I have a nice idea for a psionic warrior/pyrokineticist named Hearth for some reason... --[[User:Askewnotion|Askewnotion]] 15:36, 4 December 2008 (UTC) | I have a nice idea for a psionic warrior/pyrokineticist named Hearth for some reason... --[[User:Askewnotion|Askewnotion]] 15:36, 4 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
::Pyrokineticist is not a cold-themed prestige class. ;-) --[[User:Wizardoest|Wizardoest]] 17:56, 4 December 2008 (UTC) | ::Pyrokineticist is not a cold-themed prestige class. ;-) --[[User:Wizardoest|Wizardoest]] 17:56, 4 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
:::Posted before the PrC listing. Ah well. I'm sure I'll be able to think of something. Chances are Carrie will be able to make it down for this, too.--[[User:Askewnotion|Askewnotion]] 21:10, 4 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
Barbarian + Monk? Bard + Paladin? Conflicting alignments usually. --[[User:Robhim|Robhim]] 18:44, 4 December 2008 (UTC) | Barbarian + Monk? Bard + Paladin? Conflicting alignments usually. --[[User:Robhim|Robhim]] 18:44, 4 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
::Clarified it better by saying Good and Neutral alignments only. --[[User:Wizardoest|Wizardoest]] 20:43, 4 December 2008 (UTC) | ::Clarified it better by saying Good and Neutral alignments only. --[[User:Wizardoest|Wizardoest]] 20:43, 4 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 13:10, 4 December 2008
I have a nice idea for a psionic warrior/pyrokineticist named Hearth for some reason... --Askewnotion 15:36, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
- Pyrokineticist is not a cold-themed prestige class. ;-) --Wizardoest 17:56, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
- Posted before the PrC listing. Ah well. I'm sure I'll be able to think of something. Chances are Carrie will be able to make it down for this, too.--Askewnotion 21:10, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
- Pyrokineticist is not a cold-themed prestige class. ;-) --Wizardoest 17:56, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
Barbarian + Monk? Bard + Paladin? Conflicting alignments usually. --Robhim 18:44, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
- Clarified it better by saying Good and Neutral alignments only. --Wizardoest 20:43, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
