Wild talk:Custom/Erf: Difference between revisions
From Drinking and Dragons
>Mqs Created page with 'Help me to work these out. Comparing lesser erf to half-elf, it needs a little something, but not much. Greater Erf, as written, was a strong +1, but it's weak as a +2. Ideas?...' |
>T3knomanser mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Help me to work these out. Comparing lesser erf to half-elf, it needs a little something, but not much. Greater Erf, as written, was a strong +1, but it's weak as a +2. Ideas? --[[User:Mqs|Mqs]] 15:24, 5 June 2009 (UTC) | Help me to work these out. Comparing lesser erf to half-elf, it needs a little something, but not much. Greater Erf, as written, was a strong +1, but it's weak as a +2. Ideas? --[[User:Mqs|Mqs]] 15:24, 5 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
::Erfs should be very stable. No, wait, did that already. While it doesn't completely fix the balance, I think they should get a +2 appraise as well. --[[User:T3knomanser|t3knomanser]] 01:39, 6 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:39, 6 June 2009
Help me to work these out. Comparing lesser erf to half-elf, it needs a little something, but not much. Greater Erf, as written, was a strong +1, but it's weak as a +2. Ideas? --Mqs 15:24, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
- Erfs should be very stable. No, wait, did that already. While it doesn't completely fix the balance, I think they should get a +2 appraise as well. --t3knomanser 01:39, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
