A:PC/Mauritius val'Emman/Occisor: Difference between revisions
From Drinking and Dragons
>Mqs No edit summary |
>Askewnotion No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
*It was off-hand suggested to increase the hit die by one size. --[[User:Mqs|Mqs]] 17:54, 8 June 2009 (UTC) | *It was off-hand suggested to increase the hit die by one size. --[[User:Mqs|Mqs]] 17:54, 8 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
*Shadow sclupted items need more options. Who wants to carry around bulky shadow stuff armor when you can easily buy materials that have things weight half as much. Mimic materials? General modifications? Greater than MW quality? --[[User:Askewnotion|Askewnotion]] 23:36, 9 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
*Though we will never reach 20th, doesn't ''Into the Darkness'' seem pretty awful? -4 is pretty drastic. --[[User:Askewnotion|Askewnotion]] 23:36, 9 June 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:36, 9 June 2009
Discussion of changes that people are proposing to the Occisor class.
- Even out the sneak attack damage to 1d6 every odd level starting at 3rd as opposed to the +2d6 SA damage every 4 levels. It will prevent huge power spikes at levels 7, 11, 15, and 19. --Askewnotion 03:16, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
- It was off-hand suggested to increase the hit die by one size. --Mqs 17:54, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
- Shadow sclupted items need more options. Who wants to carry around bulky shadow stuff armor when you can easily buy materials that have things weight half as much. Mimic materials? General modifications? Greater than MW quality? --Askewnotion 23:36, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
- Though we will never reach 20th, doesn't Into the Darkness seem pretty awful? -4 is pretty drastic. --Askewnotion 23:36, 9 June 2009 (UTC)