User talk:Mqs/Greater Eschew Materials: Difference between revisions
From Drinking and Dragons
>Mqs Created page with 'I don't believe that XP should be Eschewed. How would eschewing GP interact with expensive foci? Would expensive material components be partially reduced, e.g. paying on 400gp fo...' |
>Mqs mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I don't believe that XP should be Eschewed. How would eschewing GP interact with expensive foci? Would expensive material components be partially reduced, e.g. paying on 400gp for ''Stoneskin''? --<strong>[[User:Wizardoest|Randy]]</strong> ([[User talk:Wizardoest|Talk]]) 18:24, 23 July 2009 (UTC) | I don't believe that XP should be Eschewed. How would eschewing GP interact with expensive foci? Would expensive material components be partially reduced, e.g. paying on 400gp for ''Stoneskin''? --<strong>[[User:Wizardoest|Randy]]</strong> ([[User talk:Wizardoest|Talk]]) 18:24, 23 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
:I would not have it affect foci. They are not consumed -- foci have never been a problem for me as a player or that I've heard from others. Partial reduction seems feasible, but I would probably make it all or nothing. In flavor, you need a single 5000 GP diamond -- not misc. diamonds worth up to 5000 GP. --[[User:Mqs|Mqs]] 18:26, 23 July 2009 (UTC) | :I would not have it affect foci. They are not consumed -- foci have never been a problem for me as a player or that I've heard from others. Partial reduction seems feasible, but I would probably make it all or nothing. In flavor, you need a single 5000 GP diamond -- not misc. diamonds worth up to 5000 GP. (So balance, yes -- partial reduce; flavor and thematically, no -- do not reduce.) --[[User:Mqs|Mqs]] 18:26, 23 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 18:27, 23 July 2009
I don't believe that XP should be Eschewed. How would eschewing GP interact with expensive foci? Would expensive material components be partially reduced, e.g. paying on 400gp for Stoneskin? --Randy (Talk) 18:24, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
- I would not have it affect foci. They are not consumed -- foci have never been a problem for me as a player or that I've heard from others. Partial reduction seems feasible, but I would probably make it all or nothing. In flavor, you need a single 5000 GP diamond -- not misc. diamonds worth up to 5000 GP. (So balance, yes -- partial reduce; flavor and thematically, no -- do not reduce.) --Mqs 18:26, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
