Difference between revisions of "Disposable talk:The Hunting of the Crimson Lord"
From Drinking and Dragons
Wizardoest (talk | contribs) |
>Askewnotion |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::I drew the line at spells and not spell-like abilities. While characters will have a few spell-like abilities, there will not be a full strength caster in the group. I'm not certain about the ToM and ToB classes, so I thought that I would post them as a possibility and let someone try to talk me into them. --[[User:Wizardoest|Wizardoest]] 14:18, 21 May 2008 (UTC) | ::I drew the line at spells and not spell-like abilities. While characters will have a few spell-like abilities, there will not be a full strength caster in the group. I'm not certain about the ToM and ToB classes, so I thought that I would post them as a possibility and let someone try to talk me into them. --[[User:Wizardoest|Wizardoest]] 14:18, 21 May 2008 (UTC) | ||
:::Well, I'm not too sure about the Truenamer, since it just seems like a mage with an extra chore attached, but the Shadowcaster is kinda sucktastic if you read it over. It's that kinda suck I like, but a nice "non-caster power level" mage. I somewhat agree on the Artificer since they are kinda limited by gold and XP cost, though the warlock is basicly a war mage focused on rays to me, except that it actually has utility abilities. As a side note, Tome of Battle is easily abusable and I shall show you the full fury of cheese if it is allowed (480 damage a turn cheese)... --[[User:Askewnotion|Askewnotion]] 14:30, 21 May 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:30, 21 May 2008
"Shadowcaster (Tome of Magic), Truenamer (Tome of Magic), Classes from Tome of Battle are being considered."
If you don't want magic, why allow those? They're magic with another name. Ditto artificer, warlock... --Robhim 03:06, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
- I drew the line at spells and not spell-like abilities. While characters will have a few spell-like abilities, there will not be a full strength caster in the group. I'm not certain about the ToM and ToB classes, so I thought that I would post them as a possibility and let someone try to talk me into them. --Wizardoest 14:18, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
- Well, I'm not too sure about the Truenamer, since it just seems like a mage with an extra chore attached, but the Shadowcaster is kinda sucktastic if you read it over. It's that kinda suck I like, but a nice "non-caster power level" mage. I somewhat agree on the Artificer since they are kinda limited by gold and XP cost, though the warlock is basicly a war mage focused on rays to me, except that it actually has utility abilities. As a side note, Tome of Battle is easily abusable and I shall show you the full fury of cheese if it is allowed (480 damage a turn cheese)... --Askewnotion 14:30, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
