Difference between revisions of "A talk:PC/Kweto Lucullus"
From Drinking and Dragons
>Arz m (replies) |
>Askewnotion m |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
The Complete Champion variant is too powerful. Have you looked at the Complete Warrior no-spellcasting variant on p13? --<strong>[[User:Wizardoest|Randy]]</strong> ([[User talk:Wizardoest|Talk]]) 02:18, 4 May 2009 (UTC) | The Complete Champion variant is too powerful. Have you looked at the Complete Warrior no-spellcasting variant on p13? --<strong>[[User:Wizardoest|Randy]]</strong> ([[User talk:Wizardoest|Talk]]) 02:18, 4 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
::I actually would say that the non-spellcasting Paladin/Ranger from CCh are two of the actually reasonable things from the book. The non-spellcasters from CW are essentially useless. However, I understand completely your not wanting to open up CCh for use. --[[User:Mqs|Mqs]] 11:22, 4 May 2009 (UTC) | ::I actually would say that the non-spellcasting Paladin/Ranger from CCh are two of the actually reasonable things from the book. The non-spellcasters from CW are essentially useless. However, I understand completely your not wanting to open up CCh for use. --[[User:Mqs|Mqs]] 11:22, 4 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
::::I also see the CCh varient as reasonably fair. The feats are pretty spaced out and I'd say that each feat would be comparable to gaining a new spell level. Just throwing in my two cents. --[[User:Askewnotion|Askewnotion]] 16:39, 4 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::I see the CW variant as horribly underwhelming. No spells for fast movement @ 6th and late (sp) @ 11, 13, & 16. I can see you just want me to have spells. Meanie! The CC variant is feats @ 4,8,12, etc when they pick up new spell lvl access. --[[User:Arz|Arz]] 15:11, 4 May 2009 (UTC) | :::I see the CW variant as horribly underwhelming. No spells for fast movement @ 6th and late (sp) @ 11, 13, & 16. I can see you just want me to have spells. Meanie! The CC variant is feats @ 4,8,12, etc when they pick up new spell lvl access. --[[User:Arz|Arz]] 15:11, 4 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::Also on alternate feature talk; I submit if for need or other tracker in group I could try the Dungeonscape trapfinding ranger. I don't care one way or the other, its just a minor skill flip to me. --[[User:Arz|Arz]] 15:11, 4 May 2009 (UTC) | :::Also on alternate feature talk; I submit if for need or other tracker in group I could try the Dungeonscape trapfinding ranger. I don't care one way or the other, its just a minor skill flip to me. --[[User:Arz|Arz]] 15:11, 4 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
Unless you take the Heirloom feat you may not possess or purchase a Kio sword. --<strong>[[User:Wizardoest|Randy]]</strong> ([[User talk:Wizardoest|Talk]]) 02:20, 4 May 2009 (UTC) | Unless you take the Heirloom feat you may not possess or purchase a Kio sword. --<strong>[[User:Wizardoest|Randy]]</strong> ([[User talk:Wizardoest|Talk]]) 02:20, 4 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
::Then why did they put a price beside the kio sword? Admittedly the heirloom feat is a way of getting one before you'd normally have the cash. I just took the other route to make myself horribly poor and underequipped. Which was actually a goal for me, buy item I can't use cause its illegal-check. --[[User:Arz|Arz]] 15:11, 4 May 2009 (UTC) | ::Then why did they put a price beside the kio sword? Admittedly the heirloom feat is a way of getting one before you'd normally have the cash. I just took the other route to make myself horribly poor and underequipped. Which was actually a goal for me, buy item I can't use cause its illegal-check. --[[User:Arz|Arz]] 15:11, 4 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 09:39, 4 May 2009
Just glancing at this before bed. Would you mind sourcing anything that isn't core for easier reference (including the advancement chart). Note in the feat Pureblooded Kio the following "Pureblood Kio who choose the Heirloom feat may select a Kio sword". You'll need the Heirloom feat to have the Kio sword. What does AR1 and US1 stand for? --Randy (Talk) 03:17, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
- Hopefully the inlined quotes and page refs answer these questions. AR1=Altherian Ranger, US1=Urban Sentinel. Weapons won't be final till I do a logsheet later, just some stuff I want. Don't want an heirloom sword; do want a Kio GUN! sword. Can you buy Powerthirst in Kenya(Altheria)? --Arz 14:29, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
- If you did not note their is hidden text in the feat section.--Arz 19:03, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
- Anyone know a way to add space between txt sections? See how I did the skill/stat array; it needs subsection spacing. --Arz 19:03, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
The Complete Champion variant is too powerful. Have you looked at the Complete Warrior no-spellcasting variant on p13? --Randy (Talk) 02:18, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- I actually would say that the non-spellcasting Paladin/Ranger from CCh are two of the actually reasonable things from the book. The non-spellcasters from CW are essentially useless. However, I understand completely your not wanting to open up CCh for use. --Mqs 11:22, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- I also see the CCh varient as reasonably fair. The feats are pretty spaced out and I'd say that each feat would be comparable to gaining a new spell level. Just throwing in my two cents. --Askewnotion 16:39, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- I see the CW variant as horribly underwhelming. No spells for fast movement @ 6th and late (sp) @ 11, 13, & 16. I can see you just want me to have spells. Meanie! The CC variant is feats @ 4,8,12, etc when they pick up new spell lvl access. --Arz 15:11, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Also on alternate feature talk; I submit if for need or other tracker in group I could try the Dungeonscape trapfinding ranger. I don't care one way or the other, its just a minor skill flip to me. --Arz 15:11, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- I actually would say that the non-spellcasting Paladin/Ranger from CCh are two of the actually reasonable things from the book. The non-spellcasters from CW are essentially useless. However, I understand completely your not wanting to open up CCh for use. --Mqs 11:22, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
Unless you take the Heirloom feat you may not possess or purchase a Kio sword. --Randy (Talk) 02:20, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Then why did they put a price beside the kio sword? Admittedly the heirloom feat is a way of getting one before you'd normally have the cash. I just took the other route to make myself horribly poor and underequipped. Which was actually a goal for me, buy item I can't use cause its illegal-check. --Arz 15:11, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
