Difference between revisions of "Wild talk:49 Beat Down(s)"
From Drinking and Dragons
Wizardoest (talk | contribs) (Thoughts on Rod of Channeling) |
>Mqs |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Shouldn't the greater effect be 200%? This would be a proper balance to the 50%. Also, a one-in-four odds of being halved makes me less inclined to use it at all. --<strong>[[User:Wizardoest|Randy]]</strong> ([[User talk:Wizardoest|Talk]]) 14:43, 4 November 2010 (UTC) | Shouldn't the greater effect be 200%? This would be a proper balance to the 50%. Also, a one-in-four odds of being halved makes me less inclined to use it at all. --<strong>[[User:Wizardoest|Randy]]</strong> ([[User talk:Wizardoest|Talk]]) 14:43, 4 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Making it 200% turns the item into an "out of combat, heal party to full" item. --[[User:Mqs|Mqs]] 14:44, 4 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:44, 4 November 2010
Rod of Channeling -- +1 Light Mace; 30' range to drain your own HP to heal a willing ally. Supernatural. Roll a 1d4 after deciding how much HP you want to lose: 1 = heal 50% (truncate); 2,3: heal 100%; 4: heal 150%.
Shouldn't the greater effect be 200%? This would be a proper balance to the 50%. Also, a one-in-four odds of being halved makes me less inclined to use it at all. --Randy (Talk) 14:43, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
- Making it 200% turns the item into an "out of combat, heal party to full" item. --Mqs 14:44, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
