Difference between revisions of "Wild talk:Rules"
From Drinking and Dragons
Wizardoest (talk | contribs) |
>Askewnotion |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::Considering actions. This is similar to Artificer's "Hasten Infusion." --[[User:Mqs|Mqs]] 18:31, 20 February 2009 (UTC) | ::Considering actions. This is similar to Artificer's "Hasten Infusion." --[[User:Mqs|Mqs]] 18:31, 20 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::Let me know when you've decided. --<strong>[[User:Wizardoest|Randy]]</strong> ([[User talk:Wizardoest|Talk]]) 19:09, 20 February 2009 (UTC) | :::Let me know when you've decided. --<strong>[[User:Wizardoest|Randy]]</strong> ([[User talk:Wizardoest|Talk]]) 19:09, 20 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
::I'd say it's fair to have it be reduced to one round, especially since an artificer drops from 10 rounds to 1 rounds, and that is casting time, not wait time. Though, maybe to make it interesting, you spend the action point instead of rolling the 1d4 as opposed to deciding to do it after a bad roll. --[[User:Askewnotion|Askewnotion]] 19:18, 20 February 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:18, 20 February 2009
AP proposal
Another potential use for action points came up during the game tonight—using an action point to reduce the delay for summoning spells by one round. --Randy (Talk) 04:06, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
- Considering actions. This is similar to Artificer's "Hasten Infusion." --Mqs 18:31, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
- I'd say it's fair to have it be reduced to one round, especially since an artificer drops from 10 rounds to 1 rounds, and that is casting time, not wait time. Though, maybe to make it interesting, you spend the action point instead of rolling the 1d4 as opposed to deciding to do it after a bad roll. --Askewnotion 19:18, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
