Drinking & Dragons

A talk:Slush: Difference between revisions

From Drinking and Dragons
>Askewnotion
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 23: Line 23:


:: I have the MW lance and light warhorse since no one else claimed it. There is a glittersphere in the slush that I really think you should claim you item chucking madman! --[[User:Askewnotion|Askewnotion]] 18:11, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
:: I have the MW lance and light warhorse since no one else claimed it. There is a glittersphere in the slush that I really think you should claim you item chucking madman! --[[User:Askewnotion|Askewnotion]] 18:11, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
== Methodology for handling treasure ==
I suggest that moving forward the slush fund be handled the same as the Wilding slush fund.
* Loot stored in slush fund
* Loot from sessions
** session x, listing items and claims
** session y, listing items and claims
** session z, listing items and claims
I find that categorizing the loot by session, then laying claims to be a bit easier to understand than sorting by type. --<strong>[[User:Wizardoest|Randy]]</strong> ([[User talk:Wizardoest|Talk]]) 19:33, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
:: Additionally, for future please note total GP and how many shares are being divided. This helps me know at a glance that everyone (Brand, Iskander, etc) are getting their shares. Thanks. --<strong>[[User:Wizardoest|Randy]]</strong> ([[User talk:Wizardoest|Talk]]) 19:35, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 19:35, 18 September 2009

From A:6#Rewards

I'd like the breastplate, depending on what enchantment or whatnot it may have. BTW, shouldn't this very discussion happen on the slush page? --Mqs 01:57, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Did you look in the slush page? Same info is there, so nothing prevented you from posting there in the first place. In fact, I put a call out to stake your claims on the slush page. I posted the "need to knows" here as well to make sure Randy can catch my inquiries. Your passive-aggressive rebellion of not putting rewards on the session update has not gone unheard. --Askewnotion 06:59, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
I honestly looked on the slush page too -- I didn't see it. I'd've adjusted if it had just been the list of loot, but that you did the details of "sold", "ID", "Appraise"... there on the session page, I was drawn to it there. --Mqs 13:06, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Need a new ride

Lucullus thinks we should lay out some gold for better mounts. Also he'd like a war chariot because they have sharp wheels! Carriage might be a good idea for the lady though. --Arz 14:12, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

ID'ing magic items

Randy, I would like to sell all of the non-claimed items and ID the rest before Session 9. Let me know if this can all be done. - Eric

The only clerics that can identify magic items are Sarishians and there are none to be found in the city of Whon. The group would've encountered some in the streets of Blackwand, as it seems to be a melting pot of adventurers. Alternatively, you could seek out members of the Sanctorum of the Arcane for assistance but that would have to be handled in session. --Randy (Talk) 16:49, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Iskander

I mentioned this last night; deduct all CoL expenses for Iskander from Lucullus shares. If any other brothers of his order appear hospitality would dictate that Lucullus would do so for him too.

PS Whatever happened to the Mw Lance & Warhorse? --Arz 17:05, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

He still is getting a small share to give to his monistary and do charity work with and whatnot. The share is enough that he won't get one for a good while since it's still a nice sum that he is recieving.
I have the MW lance and light warhorse since no one else claimed it. There is a glittersphere in the slush that I really think you should claim you item chucking madman! --Askewnotion 18:11, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Methodology for handling treasure

I suggest that moving forward the slush fund be handled the same as the Wilding slush fund.

  • Loot stored in slush fund
  • Loot from sessions
    • session x, listing items and claims
    • session y, listing items and claims
    • session z, listing items and claims

I find that categorizing the loot by session, then laying claims to be a bit easier to understand than sorting by type. --Randy (Talk) 19:33, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Additionally, for future please note total GP and how many shares are being divided. This helps me know at a glance that everyone (Brand, Iskander, etc) are getting their shares. Thanks. --Randy (Talk) 19:35, 18 September 2009 (UTC)