Drinking & Dragons

Wild talk:Slush: Difference between revisions

From Drinking and Dragons
>Mqs
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
I'm using the <del> tag to mark the items I've moved to my logsheet. I don't know if others have a preferred way of doing this (removing them entirely is an option, but I think this allows for more back tracking) --[[User:T3knomanser|t3knomanser]] 20:44, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
I'm using the <del> tag to mark the items I've moved to my logsheet. I don't know if others have a preferred way of doing this (removing them entirely is an option, but I think this allows for more back tracking) --[[User:T3knomanser|t3knomanser]] 20:44, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
::I'm thinking on it.  I don't want the slush page to be a total inventory of all items ever, however.  I might make a "rewards" page that people can then claim from (striking, not deleting), including the slush.  Thoughts?  --[[User:Mqs|Mqs]] 14:48, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
::I'm thinking on it.  I don't want the slush page to be a total inventory of all items ever, however.  I might make a "rewards" page that people can then claim from (striking, not deleting), including the slush.  Thoughts?  --[[User:Mqs|Mqs]] 14:48, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
:::I was going hide old sessions in a HTML comment, so there was a complete record without the page getting too long. --<strong>[[User:Wizardoest|Randy]]</strong> ([[User talk:Wizardoest|Talk]]) 14:55, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:55, 3 March 2009

I'm using the <del> tag to mark the items I've moved to my logsheet. I don't know if others have a preferred way of doing this (removing them entirely is an option, but I think this allows for more back tracking) --t3knomanser 20:44, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

I'm thinking on it. I don't want the slush page to be a total inventory of all items ever, however. I might make a "rewards" page that people can then claim from (striking, not deleting), including the slush. Thoughts? --Mqs 14:48, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
I was going hide old sessions in a HTML comment, so there was a complete record without the page getting too long. --Randy (Talk) 14:55, 3 March 2009 (UTC)