Wild talk:Slush: Difference between revisions
From Drinking and Dragons
Wizardoest (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
>Mqs No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
::I'm thinking on it. I don't want the slush page to be a total inventory of all items ever, however. I might make a "rewards" page that people can then claim from (striking, not deleting), including the slush. Thoughts? --[[User:Mqs|Mqs]] 14:48, 3 March 2009 (UTC) | ::I'm thinking on it. I don't want the slush page to be a total inventory of all items ever, however. I might make a "rewards" page that people can then claim from (striking, not deleting), including the slush. Thoughts? --[[User:Mqs|Mqs]] 14:48, 3 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::I was going hide old sessions in a HTML comment, so there was a complete record without the page getting too long. --<strong>[[User:Wizardoest|Randy]]</strong> ([[User talk:Wizardoest|Talk]]) 14:55, 3 March 2009 (UTC) | :::I was going hide old sessions in a HTML comment, so there was a complete record without the page getting too long. --<strong>[[User:Wizardoest|Randy]]</strong> ([[User talk:Wizardoest|Talk]]) 14:55, 3 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
::::That would still make it hard to manage in the source when editing. Plus, a rewards page would also help to track XP, where Slush does not. I think I'll do that starting with the next session. --[[User:Mqs|Mqs]] 15:03, 3 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:03, 3 March 2009
I'm using the <del> tag to mark the items I've moved to my logsheet. I don't know if others have a preferred way of doing this (removing them entirely is an option, but I think this allows for more back tracking) --t3knomanser 20:44, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- I'm thinking on it. I don't want the slush page to be a total inventory of all items ever, however. I might make a "rewards" page that people can then claim from (striking, not deleting), including the slush. Thoughts? --Mqs 14:48, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- I was going hide old sessions in a HTML comment, so there was a complete record without the page getting too long. --Randy (Talk) 14:55, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- That would still make it hard to manage in the source when editing. Plus, a rewards page would also help to track XP, where Slush does not. I think I'll do that starting with the next session. --Mqs 15:03, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- I was going hide old sessions in a HTML comment, so there was a complete record without the page getting too long. --Randy (Talk) 14:55, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- I'm thinking on it. I don't want the slush page to be a total inventory of all items ever, however. I might make a "rewards" page that people can then claim from (striking, not deleting), including the slush. Thoughts? --Mqs 14:48, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
