Wild talk:Slush: Difference between revisions
From Drinking and Dragons
Wizardoest (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
>Askewnotion No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:IC note. Characters have yet to talk about loot and what to do with it. Splits, slush, etc --[[User:Arz|Arz]] 15:49, 4 March 2009 (UTC) | :IC note. Characters have yet to talk about loot and what to do with it. Splits, slush, etc --[[User:Arz|Arz]] 15:49, 4 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
::Nathaniel has been assuming that our stories are all subplots in an overall tale that involves us all. As such, he has been cutting out a slice of the pie for the slush fund in addition to personal gains in gold. I was almost certain that I mentioned his desire to create a slush fund at the end of the very first treasure that we got. I'll mention it again tomorrow. --<strong>[[User:Wizardoest|Randy]]</strong> ([[User talk:Wizardoest|Talk]]) 18:34, 4 March 2009 (UTC) | ::Nathaniel has been assuming that our stories are all subplots in an overall tale that involves us all. As such, he has been cutting out a slice of the pie for the slush fund in addition to personal gains in gold. I was almost certain that I mentioned his desire to create a slush fund at the end of the very first treasure that we got. I'll mention it again tomorrow. --<strong>[[User:Wizardoest|Randy]]</strong> ([[User talk:Wizardoest|Talk]]) 18:34, 4 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
Does anyone else think it would be a good idea to leave the sapping equipment behind, but just tinker with it so that it would break, leaving whatever part it had in the upcoming evasion to an unexpected rest? If it doesn't appear to be needed, though, we should sell it. --[[User:Askewnotion|Askewnotion]] 16:20, 16 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:20, 16 March 2009
I'm using the <del> tag to mark the items I've moved to my logsheet. I don't know if others have a preferred way of doing this (removing them entirely is an option, but I think this allows for more back tracking) --t3knomanser 20:44, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
- I'm thinking on it. I don't want the slush page to be a total inventory of all items ever, however. I might make a "rewards" page that people can then claim from (striking, not deleting), including the slush. Thoughts? --Mqs 14:48, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- I was going hide old sessions in a HTML comment, so there was a complete record without the page getting too long. --Randy (Talk) 14:55, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- That would still make it hard to manage in the source when editing. Plus, a rewards page would also help to track XP, where Slush does not. I think I'll do that starting with the next session. --Mqs 15:03, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- I was going hide old sessions in a HTML comment, so there was a complete record without the page getting too long. --Randy (Talk) 14:55, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- I'm thinking on it. I don't want the slush page to be a total inventory of all items ever, however. I might make a "rewards" page that people can then claim from (striking, not deleting), including the slush. Thoughts? --Mqs 14:48, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
- IC note. Characters have yet to talk about loot and what to do with it. Splits, slush, etc --Arz 15:49, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
- Nathaniel has been assuming that our stories are all subplots in an overall tale that involves us all. As such, he has been cutting out a slice of the pie for the slush fund in addition to personal gains in gold. I was almost certain that I mentioned his desire to create a slush fund at the end of the very first treasure that we got. I'll mention it again tomorrow. --Randy (Talk) 18:34, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Does anyone else think it would be a good idea to leave the sapping equipment behind, but just tinker with it so that it would break, leaving whatever part it had in the upcoming evasion to an unexpected rest? If it doesn't appear to be needed, though, we should sell it. --Askewnotion 16:20, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
